Duty Honor Country - 2056 Words

General Westmoreland, General Grove, distinguished guests, and gentlemen of the Corps! As I was leaving the hotel this morning, a doorman asked me, Where are you bound for, General? And when I replied, West Point, he remarked, Beautiful place. Have you ever been there before? No human being could fail to be deeply moved by such a tribute as this [Thayer Award]. Coming from a profession I have served so long, and a people I have loved so well, it fills me with an emotion I cannot express. But this award is not intended primarily to honor a personality, but to symbolize a great moral code -- the code of conduct and chivalry of those who guard this beloved land of culture and ancient descent. That is the animation of this medallion.†¦show more content†¦He belongs to posterity as the instructor of future generations in the principles of liberty and freedom. He belongs to the present, to us, by his virtues and by his achievements. In 20 campaigns, on a hundred battlefields, around a thousand campfires, I have witnessed that enduring fortitude, that patriotic self-abnegation, and that invincible determination which have carved his statue in the hearts of his people. From one end of the world to the other he has drained deep the chalice of courage. As I listened to those songs [of the glee club], in memorys eye I could see those staggering columns of the First World War, bending under soggy packs, on many a weary march from dripping dusk to drizzling dawn, slogging ankle-deep through the mire of shell-shocked roads, to form grimly for the attack, blue-lipped, covered with sludge and mud, chilled by the wind and rain, driving home to their objective, and for many, to the judgment seat of God. I do not know the dignity of their birth, but I do know the glory of their death. They died unquestioning, uncomplaining, with faith in their hearts, and on their lips the hope that we would go on to victory. Always, for them: Duty, Honor, Country; always their blood and sweat and tears, as we sought the way and the light and the truth. And 20 years after, on the other side of the globe, again the filth of murky foxholes, the stench of ghostly trenches, the slime of dripping dugouts; those boiling suns ofShow MoreRelatedDuty Honor Country- Douglas Macarthur2130 Words   |  9 PagesDuty, Honor, Country â€Å"And through all this welter of change and development, your mission remains fixed, determined, inviolable: it is to win our wars,† this statement embodies Douglas Macarthur’s Speech â€Å"Duty, Honor, Country†. It was given in 1962 in acceptance of the Thayer Award, â€Å"The Award given†¦ citizen of the United States, whose outstanding character, †¦ comparison to the qualities for which West Point strives, in keeping with its motto - Duty, Honor, Country.† (AOGUSMA) It has been presentedRead MoreGeneral Douglas Macarthur s Duty, Honor, Country ``1359 Words   |  6 PagesThe Speech â€Å"Duty, Honor, Country† was delivered by General Douglas MacArthur to the Cadets of the Military Academy in West Point, New York. General Douglas MacArthur was being awarded with the Sylvanus Thayer Award to commend the General for all his hard work and devotion to the Military. The Award is a memorable tribute to the ideals that inspired the late G eneral Sylvanus Thayer, who was also known as â€Å"the Father of West Point†. In General Douglas MacArthur’s â€Å"Duty, Honor, Country† speech, he usedRead MoreEssay about Rhetorical Analysis of MacArthur’s Duty Honor Country1283 Words   |  6 Pagesmust remind ourselves to persevere and continue to defend the country. In addressing the Sylvanus Thayer Award on May 12, 1962, at the city of West Point, New York, General Douglas MacArthur urged Americans to remember the major responsibilities we have as Americans in his speech Duty, Honor, Country. With a position of authority, MacArthur powerfully stated that America will only survive through winning wars and fulfilling our duties. His main priority was to defend the nation, respect the nationRead MorePathos And Ethos In Speech1202 Words   |  5 Pages1962, General Douglas MacArthur addressed the cadets at the West Point Military Academy in his speech Duty, Honor, Country, during the reception for th e Sylvanus Thayer Award. This award is given to an â€Å"†¦outstanding citizen of the United States whose service and accomplishments in the national interest exemplify personal devotion to the ideals expressed in the West Point motto, duty, honor, country.† As the one receiving this prestigious award, General MacArthur truly exemplified these values as heRead MoreThe Prisoner s Fight, Patriotism, And Duty946 Words   |  4 PagesDo the terms honor, patriotism, and duty defines a soldier’s hardships and struggles that he encounters during times of war? Defiant, recreates the experiences of eleven men captured during the Vietnam War and sent to the various camps like Hao Lo in North Vietnam. While there the American prisoners’ commitment to their honor, patriotism, and duty would be put to the test through the harsh living conditions and torture inflicted upon them both physically and mentally. Townley’s use of William Henley’sRead MoreHow A S oldier Can Fight And Kill People From His Own Country1562 Words   |  7 Pagesthat was fought between a country divided. Abraham Lincoln once said â€Å"A house divided against itself cannot stand.† Even though we were all brought together as one nation, these two sides were polarized by their environment and beliefs. This war that tore apart a country, costed more than six hundred thousand lives. The Civil War altered history and is still relevant in the present. A big question people have today is how a soldier can fight and kill people from his own country. Why and how could anyoneRead MoreThe Army Standards1104 Words   |  5 Pagessomething weather it’s to family, friends, or a sport. It could be anything. The Army just enforces loyalty amongst the organization to keep the mission going and morale of the soldiers going. Duty is to fulfill your obligations. Doing your duty means more than carrying out your assigned tasks. Duty means being able to accomplish tasks as part of a team. The work of the U.S. Army is a complex combination of missions, tasks and responsibilities — all in constant motion. Our work entails buildingRead MoreDuty : Fulfill Your Obligations974 Words   |  4 Pagesâ€Å"Duty: Fulfill your obligations. Doing your duty means more than carrying out your assigned tasks. Duty means being able to accomplish tasks as part of a team. The work of the U.S. Army is a complex combination of missions, tasks and responsibilities — all in constant motion. Our work entails building one assignment onto another. You fulfill your obligations as a part of your unit every time you resist the temptation to take â€Å"shortcuts† that might undermine the integrity of the final product.† HereRead MoreRhetorical Analysis Of General Douglas Mac Arthur Speech781 Words   |  4 PagesUnited States thrive on the principles of the West Point motto which are: Duty, Honor, Country. General Douglas Mac Arthur was a soldier by profession and in his speech, he explains that this award is not only recognition of personality but also signifies the moral principles of the people that guard a nation. Throughout his speech, he shows his audience that soldiers have to operate by the principles: Duty, Honor, Country even in the face of war. This means putting their lives at risk and devotingRead MoreThe Gendered Struggle: Comparing and Contrasting between Masculine and Feminine Perceptions of Honor in Two Cultures1597 Words   |  7 Pagesof identity of their time: honor. Medea was a controversial character in ancient times not only because of her filicide, but because she asserted that women have honor, an idea that was not the norm in Greece. In sharp contrast to her is Hamlet, th e tragic hero that was honor-bound by his society to avenge his father’s death, yet only does so at the expense of his entire kingdom. The difference in how society treats Hamlet and Medea in their quests to preserve their honor result in tragedy for both

Architecture and memory Free Essays

string(104) " focal point intends to reflect the ambient nature of victims and culprits in the metropolis of Berlin\." Throughout history, states have sought to exhibit societal memory of their past accomplishments whilst conversely wipe outing the memory of evildoings committed during their development. These nostalgic contemplations of historic events have been both literally and figuratively portrayed in didactic memorials, which carefully edify the events into clear word pictures of province triumph and victory. However, displacements in the discourse of twentieth-century political relations have given rise to the voice of the victim within these narratives. We will write a custom essay sample on Architecture and memory or any similar topic only for you Order Now The traditional nation-state is now answerable to an international community instead than itself ; a community that acknowledges the importance of human rights and upholds moral conditions. These provinces continue to build an individuality both in the past and present, but are expected to admit their ain exclusions and accept blameworthiness for their old exploitations. In this new clime the traditional commemoration does non go disused, but alternatively evolves beyond a celebratory memorial, progressively citing the state’s evildoings and function as culprit. This progressive switch in attitude has given birth to a new signifier of commemoration: the anti-monument. These modern-day commemorations abandon nonliteral signifiers in penchant of abstraction. This medium facilitates a dialogical relationship between spectator and capable whilst besides advancing ambivalency. Critically, this new typology allows the narration of the victim and culprit to entwine into a individual united signifier, a alleged move towards political damages. This essay analyses the tradition and features of historic memorials and the post-industrial development of the anti-monument. The essay surveies and inquiries abstraction as the chosen vehicle of the anti-monument, utilizing Peter Eisenman’s Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe as a case-study. I argue that despite its accomplishment as a piece public art, basically, it fails to execute its map of memorialization through its abstracted, equivocal signifier. Traditional memorials use nonliteral imagination to organize an intuitive connexion to the spectator. They use linguistic communication and iconography to show the looker-on with the state’s idealized perceptual experience of a important event in history. Throughout clip, these memorials have frequently outlasted the civilisations or political governments who constructed them and as a consequence their undisputed specific narrative becomes unequivocal ; all memory of an alternate narration is lost with the passing of informants who could remember the existent events. This has the negative effect of relieving the contemporary visitant of duty for the past and fails to suit the invariably altering and varied position of the spectator. In this regard, the permanency of the traditional memorial nowadayss an unchallengeable narrative which becomes an active presence to the visitant, who is ever the receptive component. However, events of the 20th century such as the atomic blast at Hiroshima and the atrociousness of the Holocaust altered commemorate pattern. Memorials were no longer militaristic and celebratory but alternatively acknowledged the offenses of the province against civilians. Interior designers were faced with the countless challenge of memorializing ‘the most quintessential illustration of adult male ‘s inhumaneness to adult male – the Holocaust. ‘ An event so ruinous it prevented any effort to singularly enter the single victim. The new typology that emerged would subsequently be defined as the antimonument. The anti-monument aimed to chase away old memorial convention by prefering a dialogical signifier over the traditional didactic memorial. This new memorial typology avoided actual representation through nonliteral look and written word in favour of abstraction. This move toward the abstract enabled the spectator to now go the active component and the memorial to go the receptive component ; a role-reversal that allowed the visitant to convey their ain reading to the commemoration. James E Young commented that the purpose of these commemorations: â€Å" †¦ is non to comfort but to arouse ; non to stay fixed but to alter ; non to be everlasting but to vanish ; non to be ignored by passersby but to demand interaction ; non to stay pristine but to ask for its ain misdemeanor and desanctification ; non to accept gracefully the load of memory but to throw it back at the town ‘s pess. † In this manner, James E Young suggests that the anti-monument Acts of the Apostless receptively to history, clip and memory. He besides states: â€Å" Given the inevitable assortment of viing memories, we may ne’er really portion a common memory at these sites but merely the common topographic point of memory, where each of us is invited to retrieve in our ain manner. † The anti-monument facilitates the on-going activity of memory and allows the visitant to react to the current agonies of today in visible radiation of a remembered yesteryear. It is this point that basically determines the of import and necessary dialogical character of all modern Holocaust commemorations. Consequently, in 1999 the Federal Republic of Germany passed a declaration to raise a commemoration to the murdered Jews of Europe. This commemoration intended to ‘honour the murdered victims ‘ and ‘keep alive the memory of these impossible events in German history. ‘ An unfastened competition selected American, Peter Eisenman as the winning designer, who proposed an expansive field of 2,711 stelae and ‘the Ort ‘ , a auxiliary information Centre. The commemoration is non merely important for its intents of recollection, but besides represents the first national memorial to the Holocaust to be constructed with fiscal and political support from the German Federal State. The location of the memorial itself is considered arbitrary by some, as the site has no old intension with the Holocaust or Nazism, but alternatively was a former no-mans land in the decease strip of the Berlin Wall. Whilst the commemorating power of this location may be questioned, the significance of its arrangement lies within its integrating into Berlin ‘s urban kingdom. The edge status of the memorial nowadayss a natural passage between the stelae and the paving. The land plane and first stelae sit flower to each other before bit by bit lifting and recessing into two separate informations that create a zone of uncertainness between. The commemoration does non admit the specificity of the site and the deficiency of cardinal focal point intends to reflect the ambient nature of victims and culprits in the metropolis of Berlin. You read "Architecture and memory" in category "Essay examples" Within the stelae each visitant senses the memory of the victims somatically by sing feelings of claustrophobia, uneasiness and freak out within the narrow paseos and graduated table of the memorial. It was non Peter Eisenman ‘s purpose to emulate the restrictive status of a decease cantonment, but alternatively, to promote the personal contemplation of the person in their function of transporting memory in the present. â€Å" In this memorial there is no end, no terminal, no working one ‘s manner in or out. The continuance of an person ‘s experience of it grants no farther apprehension, since apprehension is impossible. The clip of the memorial, its continuance from top surface to land, is disjoined from the clip of experience. In this context, there is no nostalgia, no memory of the yesteryear, merely the living memory of the single experience. Here, we can merely cognize the past through its manifestation in the present. † In this sense, each visitant is invited to see the absence created by the Holocaust and in bend, each feels and fills such a nothingness. It can non be argued that this material battle with absence is non powerful ; nevertheless, in most cases the feeling becomes passing. Each visitant walks precariously around the commemoration, hesitating for idea and expecting the following corner. They are forced to alter gait and way unwillingly and face the changeless menace of hit at every bend and intersection of the looming stelae. It is this status, in my sentiment, that instills the feeling of menace and edginess into most visitants as opposed to the perceived connexion between themselves and the victims. The commemoration does non give any infinite for assemblages of people and therefore inhibits any ceremonial usage in the act of memory. The aggregation of stelae is evocative of the graveyards of Judaic ghettos in Europe where due to infinite restraints ; gravestones are piled high and crowded together at different angles. Some visitants treat the commemoration as a graveyard, walking easy and mutely, before halting and layering flowers or tapers at the side of a stele. The presence of these drab grievers and their objects of recollection are one of the lone indexs that clearly place the stelae field as a commemoration. However, the objects discarded at the commemoration are ever removed by the staff, proposing the memorial be experienced in its intended signifier ; a relationship more kindred to public art instead than that of a commemoration. In Eisenman ‘s sentiment, the commemoration is symbolic of a apparently stiff and apprehensible system of jurisprudence and order that mutates into something much more profane. The visitant experiences this first-hand when feeling lost and disorientated in the environment they one time perceived as rational and negotiable from the exterior. â€Å" The undertaking manifests the instability inherent in what seems to be a system, here a rational grid, and its potency for disintegration in clip. It suggests that when a purportedly rational and ordered system grows excessively big and out of proportion to its intended intent, it in fact loses touch with human ground. It so begins to uncover the innate perturbations and potency for pandemonium in all systems of looking order, the thought that all closed systems of a closed order are bound to neglect. † Through abstraction, the memorial efforts to admit both the victims and culprits in a individual, incorporate signifier. The regular grid of the memorial and its delusory portraiture of reason acknowledge the culprits of the offense: the Nazi Third Reich. Whilst viewed from afar, the stelae resemble gravestones in a graveyard, allowing the victims a marker for their life, a marker antecedently denied to them by a Nazi government who aimed to wipe out all memory of their being. Eisenman ‘s commemoration is concerned with how the yesteryear is manifested in the present. His involvement lies non with the murdered Jews the commemoration aims to mark, but alternatively, how the contemporary visitant can associate to those victims. In this regard, the memorial licenses recollection displaced from the memory of the holocaust itself. Eisenman wrote: â€Å" The memory of the Holocaust can ne’er be one of nostalgia. †¦ The Holocaust can non be remembered in the nostalgic manner, as its horror everlastingly ruptured the nexus between nostalgia and memory. The memorial efforts to show a new thought of memory as distinguishable from nostalgia. † The field of stelae does non show a nostalgic remembrance of Judaic life before the holocaust ; neither does it try to encapsulate the events of the race murder. Alternatively, the memorial connects with the visitant through a material battle that facilitates an single response to memory. The stelae have the consequence of making a ghostly atmosphere as the sounds of the environing streets and metropolis are deadened, overstating the visitant ‘s uncomfortableness. However, the atmosphere is disturbed by the cheering, laughter and conversation of visitants lost in the stelae looking for one another. In pronounced contrast, the subterraneous information Centre has the consequence of hushing its dwellers. The exhibition provides a actual representation of the atrociousnesss of the holocaust, pedagogically exposing the vesture, letters and personal properties of a smattering of victims. Eisenman originally rejected the inclusion of a topographic point of information so that the stelae field would go the sole and unequivocal experience. However, his competition win was conditional upon its inclusion. It is my sentiment that ‘The Ort ‘ or information Centre has become the important topographic point of memory and memorialization despite being at the same time downplayed by the designer and German province. The little edifice is located belowground and accessed via a narrow stairway amongst the stelae. As with the commemoration as a whole, there is no recognition of its being or map, and as a consequence must be discovered through roving. It performs memorialization far more successfully than the stelae field by bring forthing an emotional response from the visitant. In the exhibition, the hurt of the visitant is evident as they walk around solemnly, the world of the holocaust going perceptible. The acoustic presence of shouting and sobbing are far removed from the laughter and shouting in the stelae above. The exhibition features infinites where the lifes of victims are made hearable, explicating the sequence of events that led to their deceases. In these suites the sm allest inside informations of the victim’s forgotten lives are told in a heavy voice which instantly gives substance to the person and corporate loss. The visitant ‘s injury is perceptible here as the impossible statistics are non portrayed as abstract representations, but alternatively are actual and personified. It is the lone subdivision of the commemoration where the holocaust is explicitly present ; where visitants are non removed from the horrors but alternatively confronted with them. At street degree, the commemoration has no marks or indexs to its intent and the stelae present no carving or lettering. The abstract nature of the stelae and site as a whole have the affect of doing the commemoration a relaxed and convenient topographic point to be. The memorial has transcended the theory that commemorations command regard by their mere being, with the site going a portion of mundane life for Berliners as a topographic point of leisure. Many stumble on the commemoration as an empty labyrinth, a kids ‘s resort area where people walk across the stelae, leaping from one to another. They are faced with conflicting emotions between an inherent aptitude to demo regard and a desire to fulfill a self-generated demand to play. The commemoration ‘s aspiration is to enable every visitant to make their ain decision and determine an single experience, which through abstraction it achieves. However, by the same means, it facilitates a withdrawal between the person and the commemoration ‘s primary map of memorialization. The theoretical narration of the stelae field is an highly complex and powerful thought, nevertheless the equivocal, absent design fails to let the visitant to truly relate to the victims or derive an apprehension of the atrociousnesss of the holocaust. Therefore, whilst experienced in its uniqueness, the abstract stelae field fails to mark, alternatively being dependant on the didactic attack of the information Centre to let the visitant to associate to the holocaust and its victims. When measuring the entries for the original competition Stephen Greenblatt wrote: â€Å" It has become progressively evident that no design for a Berlin commemoration to retrieve the 1000000s of Jews killed by Nazis in the Holocaust will of all time turn out adequate to the huge symbolic weight it must transport, as legion designs have been considered and discarded. Possibly the best class at this point would be to go forth the site of the proposed commemoration at the bosom of Berlin and of Germany empty†¦ † Possibly this attack would hold finally become more pertinent. How does one design a memorial in memory of an event so impossible that in some manner doesn’t have the inauspicious affect of doing it more toothsome? Possibly, as Archigram frequently insisted, the solution may non be a edifice. The absence of a memorial delegates the duty of memorialization to the person who as carriers of memory, come to symbolize the absent memorial. The Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe is an challenging and alone position on cognitive memory that doubtless has advanced the development of the antimonument, puting a new case in point in memorial architecture. However, the commemoration ‘s effectivity is basically undermined by the premise that all visitants are cognizant, and will go on to be cognizant of the specific events of the holocaust. For illustration, how will a 2nd or 3rd coevals ‘s reading differ from that of a subsister who visits the memorial today? Its absent, equivocal signifier fails to contextualize the commemoration without the concomitant of explicit, actual representations presented individually within the Information Centre. It is for this ground that the memorial apparently becomes a victim of its ain impossibleness. Bibliography: Rauterberg, Hanno. Holocaust Memorial Berlin. ( Lars Muller Publishers ) 2005. Young, James E. The Art of Memory: Holocaust Memorials in History. ( Prestel ) 1994. Heathcote, Edwin. Monument Builders: Modern Architecture and Death. ( Academy Editions ) 1999. Williams, Paul. Memorial Museums: The Global Rush to Commemorate Atrocities. ( Berg ) 2007. Young, James E. The Texture of Memory: Holocaust Memorials and Meaning. ( New Haven ) 1993. Boym, Svetlana. The Future of Nostalgia. ( Basic Books ) 2001. Zion, Brigitte. Experience and Remembrance at Berlin. ( New York ) 2007. Choay, Francoise. The Invention of the Historic Monument. ( Cambridge University Press ) 2001. Eisenman, Peter. Notations of Affect. An Architecture of memory ( Pathos, Affekt, Gef A ; uuml ; hectoliter ) 2004. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/germans/memorial/eisenman.html – Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe Project Text. 2005. Photographs: Magnuson, Eric. ‘Pathways. ‘ ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www.flickr.com/photos/esm723/3754775324 ) 2009. Ndesh. ‘Platform Games. ‘ ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www.flickr.com/photos/ndesh/3754009233/in/photostream ) 2009. Ward, Matt. ‘Flowers. ‘ ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www.flickr.com/photos/mattward/3472587863 ) 2009. How to cite Architecture and memory, Essay examples

Standardazaion in Supply Chain free essay sample

Singapore Institute of Materials Management (SIMM) (DSCM08/15) Purchasing Management Individual Assignment Done by Rachel Chan Soon Chee Submit to Lecturer: Max Ee by 20th May 2009 Table of Contents Introduction1 Chapter 1 Part 1 Standardization of Containerization 1. Common type of container2-4 2. Benefit of Standardization in container5 3. Evolution of container6-7 4. Initiative standardization of container in Singapore7 Part 1 Standardization of Containerization 5. Common type of pallet8-10 6. Benefit of Standardization in pallet11 7. Case Studies of successful standardisation project12 Conclusion13 Reference14 Introduction Standardisation is increasingly recognised as a vital means to improve the efficiency and productivity of enterprises. As the national standards body for Singapore, SPRING Singapore’s role is to improve productivity, quality and market access for businesses and industries, protect consumer interests and enhance safety, health and environmental conditions for Singapore through the use of standardization. With globalisation and the infocomm environment, standards are essential to ensure interconnectivity and interoperability for efficiency and increased productivity. We will write a custom essay sample on Standardazaion in Supply Chain or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page To have a competitive edge, companies, especially SMEs need to be aware of standards and the advantage of implementing standards. In todays competitive and globalised environment, standards have become increasingly important in enhancing trade and productivity. The productivity boost that SIP(s bring gives an added edge to companies. Standardisation has a major impact on our lives as standards provide the fundamentals for our daily transactions. The benefits of standardisation are wide and many. Chapter 1 Part 1